Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0962

reference
788-tree-1
name
0962
tree-preservation-order

undefined

788-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040823 50.864915)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.040752 50.864907,-1.040756 50.864921,-1.040765 50.864934,-1.040781 50.864944,-1.040801 50.864950,-1.040823 50.864953,-1.040845 50.864951,-1.040864 50.864945,-1.040880 50.864935,-1.040891 50.864922,-1.040894 50.864908,-1.040891 50.864895,-1.040881 50.864882,-1.040866 50.864872,-1.040846 50.864865,-1.040824 50.864863,-1.040802 50.864865,-1.040782 50.864871,-1.040767 50.864881,-1.040756 50.864893,-1.040752 50.864907)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL